XGSG.L vs. XMME.L
XGSG.L (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged) and XMME.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XGSG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while XMME.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGSG.L returned -3.22%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for XMME.L. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. XGSG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.L.
Performance
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGSG.L is traded in GBp, while XMME.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMME.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGSG.L achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.L's 27.00% return.
XGSG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- -0.11%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- -1.29%
XMME.L
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 27.00%
- 6M
- 27.77%
- 1Y
- 53.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGSG.L Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged | -1.67% | 0.95% | -1.45% | 3.09% | -16.07% | -4.09% | 4.20% | 4.93% | 0.08% | 0.75% |
XMME.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 27.00% | 24.25% | 9.25% | 4.13% | -11.35% | -1.89% | 14.98% | 12.73% | -9.39% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGSG.L and XMME.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | -0.07 |
The correlation between XGSG.L and XMME.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGSG.L
XMME.L
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGSG.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.53 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 4.94 | -5.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 16.72 | -17.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGSG.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 2.91 | -3.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.58 | 0.50 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.44 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum XMME.L drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSG.L and XMME.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGSG.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -27.98% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.73% | -10.80% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | -15.74% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.36% | -24.54% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.27% | -2.44% | -17.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -10.03% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 3.20% | -1.74% |
Volatility
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) is 1.48%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.L) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that XGSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGSG.L | XMME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 7.88% | -6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 15.86% | -12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 18.38% | -13.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 17.04% | -11.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 18.93% | -14.25% |
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGSG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGSG.L vs. XMME.L - Dividend Comparison
XGSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while XMME.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGSG.L Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
XMME.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGSG.L and XMME.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGSG.L.
XGSG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while XMME.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XGSG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while XMME.L tracks MSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGSG.L and 0.18% for XMME.L.
Find the right allocation for XGSG.L and XMME.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer