IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L).
IGLH.L and AEGG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGLH.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. AEGG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Dec 3, 2021. Both IGLH.L and AEGG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLH.L iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.50% | 0.63% | 0.79% | 4.70% | -13.61% | -1.03% |
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | -0.07% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 5.65% | -12.74% | -0.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLH.L achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than AEGG.L's -0.07% return.
IGLH.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 1.95%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLH.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLH.L
AEGG.L
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLH.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 1.02 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.51 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.26 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 4.50 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLH.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 1.02 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.08 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLH.L and AEGG.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, while AEGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLH.L iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.98% | 2.91% | 2.33% | 1.40% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.97% | 1.19% | 0.32% |
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLH.L drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, which is greater than AEGG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLH.L and AEGG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLH.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -15.75% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | -2.38% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.32% | -1.91% | -7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -7.77% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.67% | +0.49% |
Volatility
IGLH.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) at 1.19%. This indicates that IGLH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGLH.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 1.19% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.62% | 1.91% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.79% | 3.15% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 4.60% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.75% | 4.60% | +0.15% |