PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGSD.L vs. WINC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) and iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGSD.L is traded in GBp, while WINC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WINC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSD.L achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than WINC.L's 9.72% return.


XGSD.L

1D
0.56%
1M
1.46%
6M
12.75%
YTD
15.80%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
9.19%

WINC.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
-1.00%
6M
7.47%
YTD
9.72%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XGSD.L and WINC.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.50

The correlation between XGSD.L and WINC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSD.L
XGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

WINC.L
WINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) and iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGSD.LWINC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.37

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.51

3.85

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.98

14.26

+9.73

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the WINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSD.L and WINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSD.L drawdown since its inception was -63.91%, which is greater than WINC.L's maximum drawdown of -16.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSD.L and WINC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGSD.LWINC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.91%

-16.51%

-47.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.76%

-5.36%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.67%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-2.06%

-10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.45%

-0.15%

Volatility

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) is 2.03%, while iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WINC.L) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that XGSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGSD.LWINC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

3.60%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

7.42%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.47%

10.25%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

11.63%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

11.63%

+2.28%

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGSD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WINC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGSD.L vs. WINC.L - Dividend Comparison

XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than WINC.L's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WINC.L
iShares World Equity High Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.95%9.75%4.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
4.04%4.60%6.38%7.52%8.71%4.76%5.34%4.30%4.68%3.56%2.74%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGSD.L and WINC.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WINC.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WINC.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XGSD.L.

XGSD.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while WINC.L is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XGSD.L and 0.35% for WINC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGSD.L and WINC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer