XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA
XGSD.L (Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) and CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XGSD.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the STOXX Global Select Dividend 100, while CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGSD.L returned 10.06%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for CSH.PA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGSD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH.PA.
Performance
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGSD.L is traded in GBp, while CSH.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSH.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGSD.L achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XGSD.L has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 10.06%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.
XGSD.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- 1Y
- 33.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
CSH.PA
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 12.80% | 25.50% | 9.10% | 2.81% | 4.26% | 14.86% | -4.16% | 16.96% | -5.61% | 7.02% |
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 0.04% | 7.72% | -1.02% | 1.16% | 5.11% | -6.54% | 7.70% | -6.25% | 0.43% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGSD.L and CSH.PA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank
XGSD.L
CSH.PA
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGSD.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.21 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.99 | 2.39 | +4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.29 | 5.24 | +21.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGSD.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93 | 1.17 | +2.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.37 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.26 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.20 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGSD.L drawdown since its inception was -57.01%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSD.L and CSH.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGSD.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.01% | -27.56% | -29.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | -1.96% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.54% | -3.28% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.37% | -4.89% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.91% | -11.66% | -20.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.25% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -10.49% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 0.90% | +0.37% |
Volatility
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 1.04%. This indicates that XGSD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGSD.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.04% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.35% | 2.65% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.47% | 4.01% | +4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 5.37% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 7.11% | +7.15% |
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGSD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGSD.L vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison
XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, while CSH.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 4.15% | 4.60% | 6.39% | 7.50% | 8.70% | 4.77% | 5.38% | 4.26% | 4.68% | 3.57% | 2.76% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGSD.L and CSH.PA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XGSD.L.
XGSD.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while CSH.PA is Money Market. XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XGSD.L and 0.10% for CSH.PA.
Find the right allocation for XGSD.L and CSH.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer