XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE
XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLF.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGLF.DE returned 5.16%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for XNAS.DE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGLF.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLF.DE achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 19.10% return.
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.06% | -5.36% | 9.58% | 0.55% | 1.24% | 45.06% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.10% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLF.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLF.DE
XNAS.DE
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGLF.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 3.33 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 9.64 | -8.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLF.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLF.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -31.25% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -10.00% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -26.72% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -31.25% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.78% | -2.56% | -15.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.26% | -7.75% | -10.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 3.45% | +0.66% |
Volatility
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) is 4.44%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that XGLF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLF.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 6.66% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 12.34% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 16.97% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 20.06% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 19.92% | -1.58% |
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLF.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLF.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLF.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLF.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
XGLF.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XGLF.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGLF.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer