XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE
XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Xtrackers - XGLF.DE tracks the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index while XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGLF.DE returned 5.16%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for XMME.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGLF.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLF.DE achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 28.32% return.
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- YTD
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 45.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.06% | -5.36% | 9.58% | 0.55% | 1.24% | 48.84% | -9.49% | 9.50% | 22.95% | -3.70% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 28.32% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.58% | 21.91% | -11.16% | -2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLF.DE and XMME.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLF.DE
XMME.DE
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGLF.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.42 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 4.27 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 14.15 | -12.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLF.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLF.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -31.95% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -10.68% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -19.16% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -23.46% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.78% | -4.83% | -12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.26% | -9.77% | -8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 3.23% | +0.88% |
Volatility
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) is 4.44%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that XGLF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLF.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 9.36% | -4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 17.23% | -7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 19.70% | -7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 17.22% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 19.02% | -0.68% |
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLF.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLF.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLF.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLF.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XGLF.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGLF.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer