XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLF.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGLF.DE returned 8.00%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGLF.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLF.DE achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XGLF.DE having a 8.00% annualized return and XDWH.DE not far ahead at 8.35%.
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.06% | -5.36% | 9.58% | 0.55% | 1.24% | 48.84% | -9.49% | 9.50% | 22.95% | -7.49% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLF.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XGLF.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLF.DE
XDWH.DE
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGLF.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.24 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 5.74 | -4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLF.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLF.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -40.65% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -9.82% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -21.11% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -21.11% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.16% | -26.06% | -9.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.78% | -0.35% | -17.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.26% | -7.34% | -10.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 3.83% | +0.28% |
Volatility
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLF.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 4.52% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 10.23% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 14.17% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 13.51% | +1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 15.62% | +2.72% |
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLF.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLF.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLF.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLF.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
XGLF.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XGLF.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGLF.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer