PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGLD.L is traded in USD, while ENR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENR.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGLD.L achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than ENR.DE's 31.97% return.


XGLD.L

1D
-1.36%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
3.08%
6M
5.21%
1Y
32.33%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
13.32%

ENR.DE

1D
0.78%
1M
-10.08%
YTD
31.97%
6M
40.23%
1Y
84.64%
3Y*
92.61%
5Y*
43.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XGLD.L
Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC
3.08%64.60%25.87%13.37%-0.24%-4.19%1.12%
ENR.DE
Siemens Energy AG
31.97%169.80%295.82%-29.17%-25.78%-30.95%49.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XGLD.L and ENR.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2020

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGLD.L
XGLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XGLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ENR.DE
ENR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ENR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGLD.LENR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.47

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.75

12.11

-7.37

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the ENR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGLD.L and ENR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGLD.LENR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.74

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.81

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.82

-0.34

Drawdowns

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.19%, smaller than the maximum ENR.DE drawdown of -82.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLD.L and ENR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGLD.LENR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.19%

-82.10%

+36.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-18.83%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.08%

-72.15%

+54.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.06%

-77.06%

+56.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.45%

-15.46%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-31.72%

+12.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

6.96%

-0.16%

Volatility

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) is 6.46%, while Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE) has a volatility of 12.81%. This indicates that XGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGLD.LENR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

12.81%

-6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.84%

35.82%

-13.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.82%

48.52%

-23.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

53.18%

-35.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

51.62%

-36.16%

Dividends

XGLD.L vs. ENR.DE - Dividend Comparison

XGLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ENR.DE
Siemens Energy AG
0.44%0.00%0.00%0.83%0.57%
XGLD.L
Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGLD.L and ENR.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGLD.L and ENR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer