XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L
XGLD.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while BT-A.L (BT Group plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L returned 13.32%/yr vs -3.54%/yr for BT-A.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGLD.L is traded in USD, while BT-A.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BT-A.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLD.L achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than BT-A.L's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L has outperformed BT-A.L with an annualized return of 13.32%, while BT-A.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.54% annualized return.
XGLD.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 31.36%
- 5Y*
- 18.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
BT-A.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- -3.54%
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 3.71% | 64.60% | 25.87% | 13.37% | -0.24% | -4.19% | 24.11% | 18.35% | -1.36% | 11.68% |
BT-A.L BT Group plc | 9.27% | 43.14% | 21.63% | 23.91% | -37.69% | 28.79% | -29.17% | -8.63% | -11.85% | -14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLD.L and BT-A.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGLD.L
BT-A.L
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLD.L | BT-A.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.14 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.78 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | 1.63 | +3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLD.L | BT-A.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.64 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.20 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | -0.11 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | -0.01 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.19%, smaller than the maximum BT-A.L drawdown of -83.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLD.L and BT-A.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLD.L | BT-A.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.19% | -83.54% | +38.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -22.31% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.08% | -26.92% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -52.51% | +31.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.21% | -75.92% | +54.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.94% | -41.85% | +25.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -45.86% | +26.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 10.77% | -3.90% |
Volatility
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) is 6.40%, while BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that XGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BT-A.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLD.L | BT-A.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 11.75% | -5.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 21.16% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 27.43% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 31.59% | -14.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 33.09% | -17.63% |
Dividends
XGLD.L vs. BT-A.L - Dividend Comparison
XGLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BT-A.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT-A.L BT Group plc | 4.07% | 4.46% | 5.62% | 6.23% | 6.87% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 8.00% | 6.37% | 5.67% | 3.94% | 2.73% |
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLD.L and BT-A.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XGLD.L and BT-A.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer