PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (XGII.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGII.DE is traded in EUR, while IWFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGII.DE achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than IWFQ.L's 8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XGII.DE has underperformed IWFQ.L with an annualized return of 0.11%, while IWFQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.


XGII.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.72%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
1.03%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
0.11%

IWFQ.L

1D
0.00%
1M
3.45%
YTD
8.64%
6M
9.25%
1Y
17.85%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGII.DE
Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged
1.07%2.36%-2.05%1.74%-19.09%4.43%8.19%4.79%-2.39%1.11%
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
9.67%1.80%24.66%21.68%-14.21%33.31%4.90%33.87%-3.54%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XGII.DE and IWFQ.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

-0.01

The correlation between XGII.DE and IWFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGII.DE
XGII.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XGII.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IWFQ.L
IWFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (XGII.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGII.DEIWFQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.73

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

10.99

-8.75

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGII.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGII.DE and IWFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGII.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.71

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.79

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.80

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.76

-0.63

Drawdowns

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGII.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum IWFQ.L drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGII.DE and IWFQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGII.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.58%

-31.50%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-6.51%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-20.22%

+14.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-20.22%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.58%

-31.50%

+6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.13%

-0.71%

-17.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-4.65%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.62%

-0.57%

Volatility

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (XGII.DE) is 1.21%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that XGII.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGII.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

2.23%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

7.32%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

10.38%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

14.12%

-6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.12%

14.98%

-7.86%

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGII.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGII.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

XGII.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while IWFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGII.DE
Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged
1.00%0.94%1.02%0.68%0.97%0.45%1.44%0.91%0.63%0.00%3.87%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGII.DE and IWFQ.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGII.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGII.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFQ.L.

XGII.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IWFQ.L is Global Equities. XGII.DE tracks Bloomberg World Government Inflation-Linked Bond (EUR Hedged), while IWFQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XGII.DE and 0.30% for IWFQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGII.DE and IWFQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer