PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGI.TO achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XGI.TO has underperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 12.01%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


XGI.TO

1D
0.83%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.78%
6M
12.82%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
12.01%

XIU.TO

1D
1.29%
1M
5.10%
YTD
11.56%
6M
12.35%
1Y
33.92%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGI.TO
iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
10.78%20.93%16.18%21.83%-8.79%17.71%4.62%26.37%-13.97%20.21%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
11.56%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XGI.TO and XIU.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013

0.44

The correlation between XGI.TO and XIU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XGI.TO
XIU.TO

Industrials

87.6%
7.9%

Utilities

2.9%
2.6%

Technology

2.1%
8.8%

Communication Services

0.8%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
4.1%

Basic Materials

0.2%
13.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
39.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
3.2%

Energy

-

18.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Industrials

XGI.TO
87.6%
XIU.TO
7.9%

Utilities

XGI.TO
2.9%
XIU.TO
2.6%

Technology

XGI.TO
2.1%
XIU.TO
8.8%

Communication Services

XGI.TO
0.8%
XIU.TO
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XGI.TO
0.6%
XIU.TO
4.1%

Basic Materials

XGI.TO
0.2%
XIU.TO
13.3%

Financial Services

XGI.TO
0.1%
XIU.TO
39.4%

Consumer Defensive

XGI.TO
0.1%
XIU.TO
3.2%

Energy

XGI.TO

-

XIU.TO
18.6%

Healthcare

XGI.TO

-

XIU.TO

-

Real Estate

XGI.TO

-

XIU.TO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGI.TO
XGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGI.TOXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.52

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

4.45

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

20.69

-12.98

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGI.TO and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGI.TOXIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.89

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.15

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.85

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.51

+0.12

Drawdowns

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGI.TO and XIU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGI.TOXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-52.31%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-7.65%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-12.36%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.04%

-16.36%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-35.46%

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-11.62%

+6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.64%

+1.23%

Volatility

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) at 3.43%. This indicates that XGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGI.TOXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

3.43%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

9.39%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

11.79%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

12.79%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

15.01%

+3.85%

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGI.TO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGI.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than XIU.TO's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XGI.TO
iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.39%1.54%2.69%1.24%1.34%0.90%0.96%1.30%1.88%1.12%1.35%1.41%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
2.17%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGI.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for XGI.TO.

XGI.TO is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. XGI.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for XGI.TO and 0.18% for XIU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGI.TO and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer