XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) and iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO).

XGI.TO and CEW.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGI.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Mar 26, 2013. CEW.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 6, 2008. Both XGI.TO and CEW.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) and iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XGI.TO iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	1.26%	20.93%	16.18%	21.83%	-8.79%	17.71%	4.62%	26.37%	-13.97%	20.21%
CEW.TO iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF	-0.53%	32.58%	29.48%	17.04%	-6.85%	29.26%	-0.63%	25.38%	-12.85%	11.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGI.TO achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than CEW.TO's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XGI.TO has underperformed CEW.TO with an annualized return of 11.24%, while CEW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.

XGI.TO

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -9.98%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 21.43%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

CEW.TO

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: -2.95%
• YTD: -0.53%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: 32.00%
• 3Y*: 24.23%
• 5Y*: 15.52%
• 10Y*: 13.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGI.TO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CEW.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

XGI.TO

iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

CEW.TO

iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF

Return for Risk

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGI.TO

XGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CEW.TO

CEW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CEW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CEW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CEW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CEW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CEW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) and iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGI.TO	CEW.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.39	-1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	3.04	-1.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.47	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	3.44	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.29	13.20	-6.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the CEW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGI.TO and CEW.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGI.TO	CEW.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	2.39	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	1.17	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.81	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.55	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between XGI.TO and CEW.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Dividend Comparison

XGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than CEW.TO's 2.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XGI.TO iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	1.52%	1.54%	2.69%	1.24%	1.34%	0.90%	0.96%	1.30%	1.88%	1.12%	1.35%	1.41%
CEW.TO iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF	2.81%	2.75%	3.32%	3.87%	3.84%	2.93%	3.61%	3.20%	2.95%	2.47%	2.54%	2.74%

Drawdowns

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum CEW.TO drawdown of -53.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGI.TO and CEW.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGI.TO	CEW.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.43%	-53.58%	+12.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.09%	-9.67%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.04%	-22.46%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.43%	-43.66%	+2.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.22%	-4.35%	-5.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-7.08%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.52%	+0.48%

Volatility

XGI.TO vs. CEW.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO) at 5.49%. This indicates that XGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGI.TO	CEW.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	5.49%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.71%	9.40%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.12%	13.49%	+4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	13.34%	+2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	16.99%	+1.74%