PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGEZ.DE achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 14.89% return.


XGEZ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-1.42%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
-0.58%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
10Y*

XDEW.DE

1D
0.65%
1M
2.83%
6M
10.05%
YTD
14.89%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
-0.54%-2.16%-0.51%8.88%-0.36%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.89%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XGEZ.DE and XDEW.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2022

0.14

The correlation between XGEZ.DE and XDEW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGEZ.DE
XGEZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGEZ.DEXDEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.40

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

4.61

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

14.21

-14.48

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGEZ.DE and XDEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGEZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum XDEW.DE drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGEZ.DE and XDEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGEZ.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-38.79%

+25.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-5.06%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.82%

-22.70%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-0.27%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.33%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.64%

+0.54%

Volatility

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) is 1.67%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that XGEZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGEZ.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

2.78%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.25%

6.93%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.45%

10.66%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

14.91%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.87%

16.80%

-6.93%

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGEZ.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGEZ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

XGEZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while XDEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
2.11%1.99%2.07%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGEZ.DE and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGEZ.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGEZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

XGEZ.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. XGEZ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone Sovereigns Green Bonds Capped, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XGEZ.DE and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGEZ.DE and XDEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer