PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) and Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGEZ.DE achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than KX1G.DE's 0.22% return.


XGEZ.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.02%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
-1.07%
3Y*
1.19%
5Y*
10Y*

KX1G.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.15%
1Y
0.78%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
-1.81%
10Y*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
0.02%-2.16%-0.51%8.88%0.10%
KX1G.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR
0.22%1.21%2.65%7.57%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XGEZ.DE and KX1G.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.96

The correlation between XGEZ.DE and KX1G.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGEZ.DE
XGEZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

KX1G.DE
KX1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KX1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) and Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGEZ.DEKX1G.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.02

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

0.13

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

0.34

-1.05

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the KX1G.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGEZ.DE and KX1G.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGEZ.DEKX1G.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

0.10

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.41

-0.24

Drawdowns

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGEZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum KX1G.DE drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGEZ.DE and KX1G.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGEZ.DEKX1G.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-22.43%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-3.54%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.89%

-4.22%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

-12.10%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-6.69%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.34%

+0.86%

Volatility

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE) at 1.76%. This indicates that XGEZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KX1G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGEZ.DEKX1G.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

1.76%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.12%

3.80%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

4.57%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

6.66%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

5.94%

+3.98%

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGEZ.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than KX1G.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGEZ.DE vs. KX1G.DE - Dividend Comparison

XGEZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while KX1G.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XGEZ.DE and KX1G.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, KX1G.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KX1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XGEZ.DE.

XGEZ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone Sovereigns Green Bonds Capped, while KX1G.DE tracks FTSE Lowest-Rated Eurozone Government Bond Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XGEZ.DE and 0.14% for KX1G.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGEZ.DE and KX1G.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer