PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KX1G.DE achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than XBAT.DE's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, KX1G.DE has outperformed XBAT.DE with an annualized return of 0.22%, while XBAT.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.93% annualized return.


KX1G.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.10%
1Y
0.45%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
-1.81%
10Y*
0.22%

XBAT.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.31%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
0.70%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
-2.38%
10Y*
-0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KX1G.DE
Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR
0.22%1.21%2.65%7.57%-18.42%-3.38%5.42%8.82%0.15%0.54%
XBAT.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF
-0.07%2.47%0.18%3.80%-17.06%-2.84%2.81%2.99%2.37%-1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between KX1G.DE and XBAT.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2010

0.59

Over the past year, KX1G.DE and XBAT.DE have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KX1G.DE
KX1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KX1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KX1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAT.DE
XBAT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XBAT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KX1G.DEXBAT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.06

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.35

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

1.05

-0.72

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KX1G.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the XBAT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KX1G.DE and XBAT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KX1G.DEXBAT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.31

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

-0.39

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

-0.17

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.18

+0.23

Drawdowns

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KX1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, smaller than the maximum XBAT.DE drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KX1G.DE and XBAT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KX1G.DEXBAT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-24.48%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.54%

-2.01%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.22%

-4.50%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

-21.97%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.43%

-24.48%

+2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.10%

-16.49%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-6.97%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.67%

+0.67%

Volatility

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Government Bond Lowest Rated Euro Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR (KX1G.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Xtrackers iBoxx Sovereigns Eurozone AAA Swap UCITS ETF (XBAT.DE) at 0.75%. This indicates that KX1G.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KX1G.DEXBAT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

0.75%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

1.93%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

2.23%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

6.06%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

5.39%

+0.55%

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KX1G.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KX1G.DE vs. XBAT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither KX1G.DE nor XBAT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KX1G.DE and XBAT.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KX1G.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KX1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XBAT.DE.

KX1G.DE tracks FTSE Lowest-Rated Eurozone Government Bond Investment Grade, while XBAT.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone AAA. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for KX1G.DE and 0.15% for XBAT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KX1G.DE and XBAT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer