PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF (JBEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGEZ.DE achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than JBEM.DE's -0.32% return.


XGEZ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-1.42%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
-0.58%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
10Y*

JBEM.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.15%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.32%
1Y
-0.11%
3Y*
2.06%
5Y*
-2.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
-0.54%-2.16%-0.51%8.88%-0.36%
JBEM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF
-0.32%0.42%1.18%6.64%-0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XGEZ.DE and JBEM.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2022

0.96

The correlation between XGEZ.DE and JBEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGEZ.DE
XGEZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

JBEM.DE
JBEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
JBEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF (JBEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGEZ.DEJBEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.00

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.03

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

-0.08

-0.19

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the JBEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGEZ.DE and JBEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGEZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum JBEM.DE drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGEZ.DE and JBEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGEZ.DEJBEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-22.48%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-3.21%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.82%

-3.95%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-15.11%

+9.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-10.62%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.39%

+0.79%

Volatility

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF (JBEM.DE) at 1.08%. This indicates that XGEZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGEZ.DEJBEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

1.08%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.25%

3.53%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.45%

4.23%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

6.18%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.87%

5.71%

+4.16%

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGEZ.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than JBEM.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGEZ.DE vs. JBEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

XGEZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while JBEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
JBEM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
2.11%1.99%2.07%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XGEZ.DE and JBEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JBEM.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JBEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XGEZ.DE.

XGEZ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone Sovereigns Green Bonds Capped, while JBEM.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMU Government Bond IG Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas Easy. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XGEZ.DE and 0.15% for JBEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGEZ.DE and JBEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer