PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF (JBEM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBEM.DE achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than XU61.DE's 12.23% return.


JBEM.DE

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.05%
1Y
0.52%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
-2.17%
10Y*

XU61.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.73%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
7.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JBEM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF
0.95%0.42%1.18%6.64%-18.24%-3.43%4.73%6.12%
XU61.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR
12.23%17.07%10.27%10.09%-11.67%21.21%-9.09%17.31%

Correlation

The correlation between JBEM.DE and XU61.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019

0.18

Over the past year, JBEM.DE and XU61.DE have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBEM.DE
JBEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
JBEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XU61.DE
XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF (JBEM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBEM.DEXU61.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.46

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

4.48

-4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

17.20

-16.65

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBEM.DE and XU61.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, smaller than the maximum XU61.DE drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBEM.DE and XU61.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBEM.DEXU61.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-41.19%

+18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-5.90%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.95%

-12.73%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.49%

-17.58%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.03%

-2.14%

-11.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-8.87%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.54%

-0.21%

Volatility

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG UCITS ETF (JBEM.DE) is 1.09%, while BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that JBEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XU61.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBEM.DEXU61.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

3.04%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

7.89%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

10.22%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.18%

11.65%

-5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

14.26%

-8.54%

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBEM.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XU61.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBEM.DE vs. XU61.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JBEM.DE nor XU61.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JBEM.DE and XU61.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JBEM.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JBEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for XU61.DE.

JBEM.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XU61.DE is Global Equities. JBEM.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMU Government Bond IG Index, while XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for JBEM.DE and 0.31% for XU61.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBEM.DE and XU61.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer