XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L
XGDU.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and AIGP.L (WisdomTree Precious Metals) are both Precious Metals funds - XGDU.L tracks the Gold while AIGP.L tracks the Bloomberg Precious Metals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.L returned 18.61%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for AIGP.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XGDU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for AIGP.L.
Performance
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.L achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than AIGP.L's 4.36% return.
XGDU.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 32.35%
- 3Y*
- 31.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- —
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 48.36%
- 3Y*
- 33.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 3.77% | 64.71% | 26.20% | 13.45% | 0.32% | -3.91% | 9.83% |
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 4.36% | 78.63% | 23.25% | 7.81% | -0.87% | -7.48% | 16.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.L and AIGP.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XGDU.L and AIGP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.L
AIGP.L
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDU.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.08 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 5.13 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDU.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.57 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 0.95 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.42 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum AIGP.L drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.L and AIGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -55.05% | +33.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -23.14% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -23.14% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.00% | -24.87% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.82% | -20.70% | +4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -26.79% | +19.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 9.41% | -2.59% |
Volatility
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) is 6.39%, while WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that XGDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 8.30% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.85% | 27.82% | -5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.87% | 30.70% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 22.26% | -4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 20.07% | -2.76% |
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGDU.L vs. AIGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDU.L nor AIGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XGDU.L and AIGP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XGDU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGP.L.
XGDU.L tracks Gold, while AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.L and 0.49% for AIGP.L.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.L and AIGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer