XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and XYP1.DE (Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while XYP1.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus 1-3. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.DE returned 19.58%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for XYP1.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XYP1.DE.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly higher than XYP1.DE's 0.03% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- —
XYP1.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 0.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 0.56%
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 2.16% | 49.11% | 34.18% | 9.42% | 7.01% | 3.80% | -2.93% |
XYP1.DE Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 2.37% | 3.44% | 3.75% | -4.62% | -0.71% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and XYP1.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
XYP1.DE
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDU.DE | XYP1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.11 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.55 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 1.75 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDU.DE | XYP1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.56 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.49 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.46 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than XYP1.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and XYP1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | XYP1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -5.77% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -1.39% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -1.39% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | -5.53% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -0.61% | -14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -0.93% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 0.44% | +6.04% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE) at 0.49%. This indicates that XGDU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYP1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | XYP1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 0.49% | +5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 1.25% | +18.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 1.38% | +21.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 1.75% | +14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 2.01% | +13.77% |
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XYP1.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDU.DE nor XYP1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGDU.DE and XYP1.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XYP1.DE.
XGDU.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while XYP1.DE is European Government Bonds. XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while XYP1.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus 1-3. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.15% for XYP1.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and XYP1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer