XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.DE returned 18.50%/yr vs 12.02%/yr for IUSQ.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUSQ.DE.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 11.73% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -9.05%
- YTD
- -2.66%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.50%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | -2.66% | 49.09% | 34.21% | 9.43% | 6.99% | 3.80% | -10.64% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.73% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 25.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020 | 0.08 |
The correlation between XGDU.DE and IUSQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
IUSQ.DE
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGDU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 3.97 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 16.29 | -13.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -33.60% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.77% | -6.48% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -21.25% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.77% | -21.25% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.47% | -1.37% | -18.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -4.18% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.83% | 1.58% | +7.25% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 3.41%. This indicates that XGDU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 3.41% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.80% | 8.53% | +12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.30% | 11.69% | +20.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 13.97% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 15.03% | +3.67% |
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDU.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGDU.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
XGDU.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer