XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and GOLD.AS (Amundi Physical Gold ETC C) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Gold, while GOLD.AS is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LMBA Gold Price PM USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.DE returned 18.72%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for GOLD.AS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XGDU.DE is traded in EUR, while GOLD.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOLD.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD.AS's -3.98% return.

XGDU.DE

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -8.80%
• YTD: -5.61%
• 6M: -6.76%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: 25.91%
• 5Y*: 18.72%
• 10Y*: —

GOLD.AS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.94%
• YTD: -3.98%
• 6M: -7.54%
• 1Y: 23.57%
• 3Y*: 25.76%
• 5Y*: 18.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities	-5.61%	49.09%	34.21%	9.43%	6.99%	3.80%	-10.64%
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C	-3.98%	45.37%	34.71%	9.95%	6.06%	3.08%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020	0.91

The correlation between XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGDU.DE

XGDU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 24
XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XGDU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XGDU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 31
XGDU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XGDU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

GOLD.AS

GOLD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 22
GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GOLD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GOLD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GOLD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GOLD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XGDU.DE	GOLD.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.92	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	1.31	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	1.05	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.47	2.93	-0.45

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the GOLD.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, roughly equal to the maximum GOLD.AS drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGDU.DE	GOLD.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.01%	-22.25%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.01%	-22.25%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.01%	-22.25%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.01%	-22.25%	+0.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.91%	-22.20%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.83%	-5.75%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.49%	8.02%	+1.47%

Volatility

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) is 8.00%, while Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that XGDU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGDU.DE	GOLD.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.00%	8.83%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.36%	22.73%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.53%	25.41%	+7.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.97%	16.90%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	16.54%	+2.22%

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XGDU.DE vs. GOLD.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGDU.DE nor GOLD.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XGDU.DE or GOLD.AS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XGDU.DE or GOLD.AS?

XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

What is the main difference between XGDU.DE and GOLD.AS?

XGDU.DE is categorized as Gold, while GOLD.AS is Precious Metals. XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while GOLD.AS tracks LMBA Gold Price PM USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi.