XGDU.DE vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XGDU.DE returned 29.40% vs 206.18% for CHPS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XGDU.DE is traded in EUR, while CHPS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 106.01% return.

XGDU.DE

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: 5.79%
• 1Y: 29.40%
• 3Y*: 27.75%
• 5Y*: 19.58%
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: 24.28%
• YTD: 106.01%
• 6M: 108.13%
• 1Y: 206.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities	2.16%	49.11%	34.18%	6.54%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	106.01%	39.66%	14.86%	12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XGDU.DE and CHPS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.07

Return for Risk

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGDU.DE

XGDU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 35
XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XGDU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XGDU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 39
XGDU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XGDU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGDU.DE	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	6.13	-4.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	5.81	-4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.76	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	13.84	-12.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	50.73	-46.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGDU.DE and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGDU.DE	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	6.13	-4.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.72	-0.73

Drawdowns

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -40.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGDU.DE	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.74%	-40.13%	+21.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.57%	-14.99%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.48%	-2.20%	-13.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-9.32%	+3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.48%	4.08%	+2.40%

Volatility

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) is 5.51%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.39%. This indicates that XGDU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGDU.DE	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	13.39%	-7.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.20%	27.22%	-7.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.12%	33.88%	-10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	33.72%	-17.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.78%	33.72%	-17.94%

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XGDU.DE vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

XGDU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XGDU.DE and CHPS in my portfolio?

XGDU.DE and CHPS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XGDU.DE or CHPS?

On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XGDU.DE or CHPS?

XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between XGDU.DE and CHPS?

XGDU.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while CHPS is Semiconductors. XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.15% for CHPS.