PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XGD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF) is Gold fund tracking the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index, while FTS.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XGD.TO returned 14.21%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for FTS.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than FTS.TO's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XGD.TO has outperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of 14.21%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.

XGD.TO

1D
2.99%
1M
-13.12%
YTD
-2.21%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
56.40%
3Y*
41.86%
5Y*
21.08%
10Y*
14.21%

FTS.TO

1D
0.99%
1M
5.79%
YTD
13.43%
6M
15.37%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		-2.21%144.45%19.63%3.91%-3.13%-5.81%21.10%40.18%-4.10%0.96%
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		13.43%23.93%14.24%4.76%-7.87%21.81%0.04%22.71%2.74%15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XGD.TO and FTS.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.12

The correlation between XGD.TO and FTS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF

Fortis Inc.

Often compared with XGD.TO:
XGD.TO vs. CGL.TOXGD.TO vs. GLDXGD.TO vs. ZGD.TOXGD.TO vs. MNT.TOXGD.TO vs. BRK-BXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.TOXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.SW
Often compared with FTS.TO:
FTS.TO vs. CU.TOFTS.TO vs. EMA.TOFTS.TO vs. T.TOFTS.TO vs. H.TOFTS.TO vs. VDY.TOFTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TOFTS.TO vs. TRP.TO

Return for Risk

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
FTS.TO
FTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XGD.TOFTS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.35
2.01

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.75
2.89

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

4.33

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

10.47

-5.47

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGD.TO and FTS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.56%, which is greater than FTS.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and FTS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XGD.TOFTS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.56%

-28.27%

-44.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.06%

-6.09%

-26.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.06%

-10.97%

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-24.01%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.96%

-28.27%

-18.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.60%

0.00%

-27.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-5.71%

-26.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

2.51%

+9.40%

Volatility

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.16% compared to Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) at 4.96%. This indicates that XGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XGD.TOFTS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.16%

4.96%

+11.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

10.44%

+25.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.26%

13.12%

+31.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.95%

14.45%

+18.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.55%

16.86%

+16.69%

Dividends

XGD.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FTS.TO's 3.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		3.18%3.48%3.99%4.19%4.01%3.36%3.73%3.39%3.79%3.52%3.68%3.73%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		0.64%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.77%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.10%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

XGD.TO and FTS.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGD.TO and FTS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer