XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO
XGB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETF) and XUS.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGB.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD, while XUS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGB.TO returned 1.06%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for XUS.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. XGB.TO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XUS.TO.
Performance
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGB.TO achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than XUS.TO's 12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XGB.TO has underperformed XUS.TO with an annualized return of 1.06%, while XUS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.
XGB.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.06%
XUS.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 6.80%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.75%
- 5Y*
- 16.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGB.TO iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETF | 1.57% | 1.65% | 3.54% | 5.57% | -12.25% | -3.11% | 8.14% | 6.10% | 1.34% | 1.71% |
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.75% | 12.19% | 35.16% | 23.31% | -12.59% | 27.20% | 15.56% | 24.57% | 3.31% | 13.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGB.TO and XUS.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013 | -0.00 |
The correlation between XGB.TO and XUS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XGB.TO
XUS.TO
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (XGB.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGB.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.53 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 13.40 | -11.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGB.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.63 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 1.14 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.98 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.08 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGB.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.53%, smaller than the maximum XUS.TO drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGB.TO and XUS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGB.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.53% | -27.23% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -8.63% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.83% | -18.96% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -21.85% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.53% | -27.23% | +7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | 0.00% | -5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -3.46% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.27% | -0.94% |
Volatility
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (XGB.TO) is 1.71%, while iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that XGB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGB.TO | XUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 3.15% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.49% | 8.67% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52% | 11.57% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 14.92% | -8.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 16.48% | -10.49% |
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGB.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XUS.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGB.TO vs. XUS.TO - Dividend Comparison
XGB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than XUS.TO's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGB.TO iShares Core Canadian Government Bond Index ETF | 3.11% | 3.11% | 2.95% | 2.73% | 2.64% | 2.25% | 2.12% | 2.32% | 2.44% | 2.41% | 2.53% | 2.62% |
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.12% | 1.26% | 1.03% | 1.22% | 1.38% | 0.99% | 1.35% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.48% | 1.66% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGB.TO and XUS.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUS.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XGB.TO.
XGB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XUS.TO is S&P 500. XGB.TO tracks Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD, while XUS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XGB.TO and 0.09% for XUS.TO.
Find the right allocation for XGB.TO and XUS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer