XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L
XG7S.L (Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XG7S.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XG7S.L returned 0.03%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XG7S.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XG7S.L is traded in GBp, while XDWH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XG7S.L achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, XG7S.L has underperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 0.03%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.
XG7S.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 1.33%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -2.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XG7S.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C | -0.90% | -0.22% | -1.85% | -0.74% | -8.86% | -6.63% | 6.73% | 1.94% | 4.76% | -1.81% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.35% | 7.04% | 2.51% | -1.38% | 5.83% | 21.71% | 9.57% | 18.28% | 7.59% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XG7S.L and XDWH.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2016 | 0.12 |
The correlation between XG7S.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (10 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XG7S.L
XDWH.L
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XG7S.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.21 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 3.15 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XG7S.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 0.86 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.40 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.56 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.59 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XG7S.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XG7S.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XG7S.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.59% | -18.80% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.40% | -10.43% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -18.80% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.70% | -18.80% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.59% | -18.80% | -6.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.76% | -5.80% | -17.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.52% | -4.41% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 4.01% | +6.75% |
Volatility
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L) is 1.44%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that XG7S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XG7S.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 5.30% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.54% | 10.98% | -7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.76% | 14.58% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 14.02% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 15.50% | -0.91% |
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XG7S.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XG7S.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XG7S.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XG7S.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XG7S.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XG7S.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.
XG7S.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XG7S.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XG7S.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for XG7S.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer