XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L
XG7S.L (Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C) and AEGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Bonds funds - XG7S.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD while AEGG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XG7S.L returned -0.62%/yr vs 3.84%/yr for AEGG.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XG7S.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for AEGG.L.
Performance
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XG7S.L is traded in GBp, while AEGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AEGG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XG7S.L achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than AEGG.L's 0.49% return.
XG7S.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 1.33%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -2.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XG7S.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C | -0.90% | -0.22% | -1.85% | -0.74% | -8.86% | -2.22% |
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.49% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 5.65% | -12.74% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XG7S.L and AEGG.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XG7S.L
AEGG.L
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XG7S.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.33 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 3.82 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XG7S.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 1.01 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.05 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XG7S.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than AEGG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XG7S.L and AEGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XG7S.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.59% | -15.75% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.40% | -2.38% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -3.72% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.76% | -1.36% | -22.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.52% | -7.54% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 0.83% | +9.93% |
Volatility
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XG7S.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 1.42% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.54% | 2.48% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.76% | 3.13% | +17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 4.59% | +9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 4.59% | +10.00% |
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XG7S.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XG7S.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XG7S.L nor AEGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XG7S.L and AEGG.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XG7S.L.
XG7S.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while AEGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XG7S.L and 0.10% for AEGG.L.
Find the right allocation for XG7S.L and AEGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer