XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L
XFVT.L (Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFVT.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XFVT.L returned 0.52%/yr vs 25.02%/yr for XNAS.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFVT.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.L.
Performance
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XFVT.L is traded in GBp, while XNAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XNAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFVT.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's 17.85% return.
XFVT.L
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 55.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 17.85%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 25.02%
- 10Y*
- —
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFVT.L Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 5.81% | 57.38% | -8.97% | -0.07% | -37.94% | 27.95% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.85% | 11.29% | 28.80% | 78.98% | -16.58% | -7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFVT.L and XNAS.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XFVT.L
XNAS.L
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFVT.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.31 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 9.23 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFVT.L drawdown since its inception was -87.46%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.L and XNAS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFVT.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.46% | -34.99% | -52.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.42% | -11.08% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.89% | -24.49% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.80% | -24.87% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.84% | -3.26% | -60.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.09% | -9.00% | -65.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 3.99% | +2.42% |
Volatility
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 6.37%. This indicates that XFVT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFVT.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 6.37% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.63% | 12.75% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 16.74% | +11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 23.45% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 25.87% | +0.01% |
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFVT.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFVT.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFVT.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFVT.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFVT.L.
XFVT.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. XFVT.L tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFVT.L and 0.20% for XNAS.L.
Find the right allocation for XFVT.L and XNAS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer