PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XFVT.L is traded in GBp, while ISDE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFVT.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ISDE.L's 63.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XFVT.L has underperformed ISDE.L with an annualized return of 6.44%, while ISDE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.


XFVT.L

1D
2.80%
1M
3.84%
YTD
5.81%
6M
5.40%
1Y
55.07%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
6.44%

ISDE.L

1D
-1.69%
1M
2.06%
YTD
63.04%
6M
65.63%
1Y
103.58%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XFVT.L
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C
5.81%57.38%-8.97%-0.07%-37.94%33.66%13.67%0.55%-6.19%36.66%
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
63.04%29.09%-1.86%8.34%-13.57%3.64%18.59%14.83%-12.33%29.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XFVT.L and ISDE.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2008

0.27

The correlation between XFVT.L and ISDE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFVT.L
XFVT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XFVT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ISDE.L
ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XFVT.LISDE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.67

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

8.17

-4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

26.90

-18.05

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFVT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFVT.L and ISDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFVT.L drawdown since its inception was -87.46%, which is greater than ISDE.L's maximum drawdown of -56.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.L and ISDE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFVT.LISDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.46%

-56.44%

-31.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.42%

-12.58%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.89%

-21.67%

-15.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.80%

-21.67%

-30.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.80%

-26.21%

-25.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.84%

-5.48%

-58.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.09%

-13.81%

-60.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

3.83%

+2.58%

Volatility

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) is 7.23%, while iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a volatility of 13.03%. This indicates that XFVT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFVT.LISDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

13.03%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.63%

23.95%

-4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.92%

26.15%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

18.49%

+10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

19.53%

+6.35%

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XFVT.L and ISDE.L have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

XFVT.L vs. ISDE.L - Dividend Comparison

XFVT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.08%1.06%2.51%2.77%2.10%1.79%0.98%1.55%1.64%1.02%1.07%2.32%
XFVT.L
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFVT.L and ISDE.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFVT.L and ISDE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

XFVT.L tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFVT.L and ISDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer