XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XFVT.DE (Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XFVT.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XFVT.DE returned 51.66% vs 19.74% for XDWH.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFVT.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFVT.DE achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 4.87% return.
XFVT.DE
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 51.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XFVT.DE Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 5.73% | 50.29% | -5.50% | -0.88% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 4.87% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFVT.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2023 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XFVT.DE
XDWH.DE
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFVT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.01 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 5.15 | +2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.46%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFVT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.46% | -40.65% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -9.82% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -2.12% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -7.35% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 3.84% | +2.81% |
Volatility
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 5.33%. This indicates that XFVT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFVT.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 5.33% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 10.01% | +9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.46% | 14.10% | +14.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 13.48% | +11.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 15.63% | +9.33% |
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFVT.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFVT.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFVT.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFVT.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFVT.DE.
XFVT.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XFVT.DE tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFVT.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XFVT.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer