PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XFSN.L is traded in GBP, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFSN.L achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return.


XFSN.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
6.48%
YTD
-3.47%
6M
-4.83%
1Y
-1.28%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
10Y*

IUIT.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
18.21%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.98%
1Y
57.16%
3Y*
32.13%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XFSN.L
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-3.47%2.93%34.89%21.37%-7.30%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
26.17%14.17%40.92%51.48%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XFSN.L and IUIT.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.69

The correlation between XFSN.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFSN.L
XFSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFSN.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.46

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

3.35

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

8.51

-8.62

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFSN.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFSN.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

2.81

-2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.24

-0.63

Drawdowns

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFSN.L drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFSN.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFSN.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-28.01%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.96%

-16.96%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.96%

-28.01%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.12%

-0.78%

-11.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-5.29%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.36%

6.70%

+4.66%

Volatility

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) is 4.25%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that XFSN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFSN.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

7.14%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

15.20%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

20.31%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

22.82%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

22.51%

-3.96%

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFSN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFSN.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XFSN.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XFSN.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XFSN.L.

XFSN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XFSN.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFSN.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer