XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L
XFSN.L (Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and ECAR.L (iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from DWS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XFSN.L returned 13.55%/yr vs 24.74%/yr for ECAR.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFSN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ECAR.L.
Performance
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XFSN.L is traded in GBP, while ECAR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ECAR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFSN.L achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than ECAR.L's 61.55% return.
XFSN.L
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 6M
- -4.83%
- 1Y
- -1.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECAR.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 24.63%
- YTD
- 61.55%
- 6M
- 63.54%
- 1Y
- 99.07%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFSN.L Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -3.47% | 2.93% | 34.89% | 21.37% | -7.30% |
ECAR.L iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 61.55% | 15.47% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -6.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFSN.L and ECAR.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XFSN.L and ECAR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L — Risk / Return Rank
XFSN.L
ECAR.L
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFSN.L | ECAR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.62 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 7.96 | -8.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 24.25 | -24.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFSN.L | ECAR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 3.99 | -4.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.66 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFSN.L drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, smaller than the maximum ECAR.L drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFSN.L and ECAR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFSN.L | ECAR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | -35.94% | +11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.96% | -12.38% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.96% | -28.42% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.12% | 0.00% | -12.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -8.68% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 4.07% | +7.29% |
Volatility
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) is 4.25%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a volatility of 11.93%. This indicates that XFSN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFSN.L | ECAR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 11.93% | -7.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 20.17% | -8.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 24.75% | -9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 22.87% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 23.91% | -5.36% |
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFSN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFSN.L vs. ECAR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFSN.L nor ECAR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFSN.L and ECAR.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XFSN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XFSN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ECAR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XFSN.L and 0.40% for ECAR.L.
Find the right allocation for XFSN.L and ECAR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer