PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFR.TO achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 10.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XFR.TO has underperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 2.24%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.


XFR.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
2.24%

XIU.TO

1D
-0.87%
1M
3.47%
YTD
10.14%
6M
12.10%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XFR.TO
iShares Floating Rate Index ETF
1.00%3.33%4.57%5.29%1.82%0.15%0.98%2.23%1.16%1.46%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
10.14%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XFR.TO and XIU.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2011

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFR.TO
XFR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XFR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFR.TOXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.49

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.79

4.16

+25.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

88.61

19.30

+69.31

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is higher than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFR.TO and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFR.TOXIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

2.71

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.92

1.13

+2.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.22

0.85

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.51

+0.68

Drawdowns

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFR.TO and XIU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFR.TOXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-52.31%

+48.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-7.65%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-12.36%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.30%

-16.36%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.12%

-35.46%

+31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.87%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-11.63%

+11.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.64%

-1.61%

Volatility

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) is 0.18%, while iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that XFR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFR.TOXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

3.28%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.48%

9.32%

-8.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72%

11.73%

-11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

12.78%

-11.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.85%

15.01%

-13.16%

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFR.TO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XFR.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XFR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than XIU.TO's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XFR.TO
iShares Floating Rate Index ETF
2.77%3.23%4.93%4.91%1.85%0.30%1.07%1.96%1.60%0.95%0.77%0.94%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
2.20%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFR.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.

XFR.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. XFR.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XFR.TO and 0.18% for XIU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFR.TO and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer