XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XFNT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and WELL.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both Technology Equities funds - XFNT.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Fintech Innovation Select ESG Screened 100 while WELL.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XFNT.DE returned 13.58%/yr vs 27.36%/yr for WELL.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFNT.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELL.DE.

Performance

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFNT.DE achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than WELL.DE's 21.22% return.

XFNT.DE

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: -2.44%
• 6M: -4.38%
• 1Y: -4.40%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WELL.DE

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 12.90%
• YTD: 21.22%
• 6M: 19.95%
• 1Y: 44.12%
• 3Y*: 27.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XFNT.DE Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	-2.44%	-1.22%	40.05%	24.41%	0.12%
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist	21.22%	9.77%	38.81%	57.34%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XFNT.DE and WELL.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022	0.71

The correlation between XFNT.DE and WELL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFNT.DE

XFNT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XFNT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XFNT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XFNT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
XFNT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

WELL.DE

WELL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
WELL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
WELL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WELL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
WELL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
WELL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFNT.DE	WELL.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.17	-2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.21	2.84	-3.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.36	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	2.71	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	7.03	-7.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the WELL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFNT.DE and WELL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFNT.DE	WELL.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	2.17	-2.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.52	-0.92

Drawdowns

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFNT.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, smaller than the maximum WELL.DE drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFNT.DE and WELL.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFNT.DE	WELL.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.32%	-28.78%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.51%	-16.18%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.32%	-28.78%	+2.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.64%	-2.72%	-10.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-4.72%	-2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.20%	6.26%	+4.94%

Volatility

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) is 4.90%, while Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that XFNT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WELL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFNT.DE	WELL.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	6.79%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	14.75%	-1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	20.24%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	22.20%	-2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.33%	22.20%	-2.87%

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFNT.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WELL.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFNT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Dividend Comparison

XFNT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist	0.27%	0.35%	0.36%	0.14%
XFNT.DE Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFNT.DE and WELL.DE in my portfolio?

XFNT.DE and WELL.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XFNT.DE or WELL.DE?

On fees, WELL.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFNT.DE or WELL.DE?

WELL.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XFNT.DE.

What is the main difference between XFNT.DE and WELL.DE?

XFNT.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Fintech Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XFNT.DE and 0.18% for WELL.DE.