PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XFNT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-14.58%-1.22%40.05%24.41%-8.56%
XNNV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-9.13%2.05%29.19%29.66%-13.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFNT.DE achieves a -14.58% return, which is significantly lower than XNNV.DE's -9.13% return.


XFNT.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-14.58%
6M
-20.60%
1Y
-13.47%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
10Y*

XNNV.DE

1D
2.05%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-9.13%
6M
-8.40%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XFNT.DE and XNNV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Return for Risk

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFNT.DE
XFNT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

XNNV.DE
XNNV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XNNV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFNT.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

0.08

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.76

0.24

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.03

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

0.11

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.47

0.33

-1.80

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the XNNV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFNT.DE and XNNV.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFNT.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

0.08

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.46

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XFNT.DE and XNNV.DE is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XFNT.DE nor XNNV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFNT.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, roughly equal to the maximum XNNV.DE drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFNT.DE and XNNV.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XFNT.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-25.90%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.51%

-15.02%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.38%

-12.46%

-11.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-6.70%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.23%

4.91%

+4.32%

Volatility

XFNT.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XFNT.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

5.34%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

11.20%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.30%

19.10%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

18.20%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

18.20%

+1.19%