PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFNT.DE achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.DE's 17.14% return.


XFNT.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
5.39%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-3.93%
1Y
-4.02%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
10Y*

KROP.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.32%
YTD
17.14%
6M
14.58%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
-2.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XFNT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-2.44%-1.22%40.05%24.41%-8.56%
KROP.DE
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
17.14%-4.87%-2.79%-25.11%-18.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XFNT.DE and KROP.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between XFNT.DE and KROP.DE has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFNT.DE
XFNT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP.DE
KROP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KROP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFNT.DEKROP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.12

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

1.04

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

2.21

-2.57

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the KROP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFNT.DE and KROP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFNT.DEKROP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

0.62

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

-0.47

+1.07

Drawdowns

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFNT.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, smaller than the maximum KROP.DE drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFNT.DE and KROP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFNT.DEKROP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-52.74%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.51%

-9.22%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-27.28%

+0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-41.08%

+27.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-36.46%

+29.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

4.34%

+6.86%

Volatility

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) is 4.90%, while Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that XFNT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KROP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFNT.DEKROP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

5.58%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

12.02%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

15.43%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

19.64%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

19.64%

-0.31%

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFNT.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFNT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XFNT.DE nor KROP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XFNT.DE and KROP.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFNT.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFNT.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.DE.

XFNT.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Fintech Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XFNT.DE and 0.50% for KROP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFNT.DE and KROP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer