PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFNT.DE achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than EBUY.DE's 20.16% return.


XFNT.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
4.90%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-4.38%
1Y
-4.40%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
10Y*

EBUY.DE

1D
-0.91%
1M
10.57%
YTD
20.16%
6M
17.71%
1Y
30.92%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XFNT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-2.44%-1.22%40.05%24.41%-8.56%
EBUY.DE
Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc
20.16%5.79%32.69%32.60%-12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XFNT.DE and EBUY.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022

0.86

The correlation between XFNT.DE and EBUY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFNT.DE
XFNT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

EBUY.DE
EBUY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBUY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBUY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EBUY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBUY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFNT.DEEBUY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.26

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

1.00

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

1.94

-2.30

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the EBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFNT.DE and EBUY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFNT.DEEBUY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.02

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Drawdowns

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFNT.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, smaller than the maximum EBUY.DE drawdown of -42.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFNT.DE and EBUY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFNT.DEEBUY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-42.56%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.51%

-29.99%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-29.99%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-2.21%

-11.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-16.85%

+9.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

15.53%

-4.33%

Volatility

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) is 4.90%, while Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.DE) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that XFNT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBUY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFNT.DEEBUY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

6.05%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

14.82%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

29.60%

-12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

24.58%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

24.47%

-5.14%

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFNT.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EBUY.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFNT.DE vs. EBUY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XFNT.DE nor EBUY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XFNT.DE and EBUY.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFNT.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFNT.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EBUY.DE.

XFNT.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Fintech Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while EBUY.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XFNT.DE and 0.45% for EBUY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFNT.DE and EBUY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer