XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO
XFN.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFN.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XFN.TO returned 16.93%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for XDIV.TO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XFN.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFN.TO achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.
XFN.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 41.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 38.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.42%
- 10Y*
- —
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 12.51% | 34.40% | 29.32% | 13.09% | -9.92% | 35.57% | 0.99% | 20.66% | -9.76% | 11.48% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 19.17% | 24.92% | 19.56% | 11.71% | 0.29% | 32.25% | -7.81% | 24.84% | -10.04% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFN.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XFN.TO and XDIV.TO has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XFN.TO
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XFN.TO
XDIV.TO
Basic Materials
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Communication Services
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Energy
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Healthcare
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Industrials
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Real Estate
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Technology
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Utilities
XFN.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XFN.TO
XDIV.TO
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFN.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 2.03 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.35 | 16.64 | -11.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.60 | 56.55 | -34.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFN.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 4.94 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | 1.57 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.81 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFN.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFN.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -41.30% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -2.33% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.37% | -10.53% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -17.60% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.09% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -4.25% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 0.69% | +1.24% |
Volatility
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that XFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFN.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 2.81% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | 6.36% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 7.85% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 10.53% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 16.01% | +0.52% |
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.81% | 4.29% | 4.20% | 3.95% | 3.58% | 4.58% | 4.02% | 4.85% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 2.17% | 2.39% | 3.16% | 3.60% | 3.48% | 2.67% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.43% | 2.73% | 2.83% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFN.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.
XFN.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. XFN.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XFN.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for XFN.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer