PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFN.TO achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.


XFN.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.10%
YTD
12.51%
6M
17.66%
1Y
41.54%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
14.38%

XDIV.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
3.65%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.94%
1Y
38.61%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF
12.51%34.40%29.32%13.09%-9.92%35.57%0.99%20.66%-9.76%11.48%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
19.17%24.92%19.56%11.71%0.29%32.25%-7.81%24.84%-10.04%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XFN.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between XFN.TO and XDIV.TO has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XFN.TO
XDIV.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
46.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

28.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

11.3%

Financial Services

XFN.TO
100.0%
XDIV.TO
46.7%

Basic Materials

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Communication Services

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Energy

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO
28.8%

Healthcare

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Industrials

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Real Estate

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Technology

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO
1.3%

Utilities

XFN.TO

-

XDIV.TO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFN.TO
XFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFN.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

2.03

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

16.64

-11.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.60

56.55

-34.94

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFN.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFN.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

4.94

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

1.57

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.81

-0.17

Drawdowns

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFN.TO and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFN.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.55%

-41.30%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-2.33%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-10.53%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-17.60%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-0.09%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-4.25%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

0.69%

+1.24%

Volatility

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that XFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFN.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

2.81%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

6.36%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

7.85%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

10.53%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.01%

+0.52%

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFN.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.28%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%0.00%0.00%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF
2.17%2.39%3.16%3.60%3.48%2.67%3.35%3.00%3.43%2.73%2.83%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFN.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.

XFN.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. XFN.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XFN.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFN.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer