PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XFN.TO vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XFN.TO vs. JNJ

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XFN.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XFN.TO returned 15.21%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XFN.TO is traded in CAD, while JNJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JNJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFN.TO achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 20.07% return. Over the past 10 years, XFN.TO has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 15.21%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.

XFN.TO

1D
0.81%
1M
7.31%
YTD
17.97%
6M
19.57%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
31.45%
5Y*
18.22%
10Y*
15.21%

JNJ

1D
1.25%
1M
7.01%
YTD
20.07%
6M
16.75%
1Y
61.50%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF		17.97%34.40%29.32%13.09%-9.92%35.57%0.99%20.66%-9.76%12.54%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson		20.07%40.75%3.25%-10.75%12.69%11.38%8.19%11.43%2.85%16.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XFN.TO and JNJ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.23

The correlation between XFN.TO and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF

Johnson & Johnson

Often compared with XFN.TO:
XFN.TO vs. VDY.TOXFN.TO vs. CEW.TOXFN.TO vs. FIE.TOXFN.TO vs. XIU.TOXFN.TO vs. VFV.TOXFN.TO vs. RY.TOXFN.TO vs. XUS-U.TO
Often compared with JNJ:
JNJ vs. ABBVJNJ vs. PFEJNJ vs. UNHJNJ vs. VOOJNJ vs. SCHDJNJ vs. ABTJNJ vs. MDT

Return for Risk

XFN.TO vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XFN.TO
XFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XFN.TOJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.95
3.50

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.49
4.93

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.62

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.20

5.49

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.03

16.87

+8.16

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is comparable to the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFN.TO and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -27.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFN.TO and JNJ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XFN.TOJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.53%

-27.32%

-28.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-11.20%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-15.59%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-16.71%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-20.93%

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-8.41%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.64%

-1.71%

Volatility

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) is 4.08%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that XFN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XFN.TOJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.81%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

12.96%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

17.55%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

18.00%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

19.58%

-3.04%

Dividends

XFN.TO vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than JNJ's 2.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson		2.18%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF		2.07%2.39%3.16%3.60%3.48%2.67%3.35%3.00%3.43%2.73%2.83%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

XFN.TO and JNJ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFN.TO and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer