XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

XFN.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) and CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFN.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while CLSA.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Brompton Funds. XFN.TO is passively managed, while CLSA.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, XFN.TO returned 54.40% vs 92.59% for CLSA.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFN.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CLSA.TO.

Performance

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFN.TO achieves a 26.99% return, which is significantly lower than CLSA.TO's 42.34% return.

XFN.TO

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: 7.16%
• 6M: 25.66%
• YTD: 26.99%
• 1Y: 54.40%
• 3Y*: 33.64%
• 5Y*: 20.04%
• 10Y*: 15.82%

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 12.81%
• 6M: 42.95%
• YTD: 42.34%
• 1Y: 92.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF	26.99%	36.84%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	42.34%	57.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XFN.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.72

The correlation between XFN.TO and CLSA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFN.TO

XFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
XFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
XFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
XFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XFN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.39	6.45	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.94	7.27	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	2.25	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.01	8.64	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.28	37.70	-9.42

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is lower than the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFN.TO and CLSA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFN.TO and CLSA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.53%	-11.73%	-43.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-10.78%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-1.26%	-5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.46%	-0.53%

Volatility

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) is 3.30%, while Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that XFN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFN.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.94%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	12.91%	-2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	14.43%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.55%	16.28%	-2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	16.28%	+0.23%

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSA.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFN.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than CLSA.TO's 9.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	9.64%	7.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF	1.92%	2.39%	3.16%	3.60%	3.48%	2.67%	3.35%	3.00%	3.43%	2.73%	2.83%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFN.TO and CLSA.TO in my portfolio?

XFN.TO and CLSA.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XFN.TO or CLSA.TO?

On fees, CLSA.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFN.TO or CLSA.TO?

CLSA.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.

What is the main difference between XFN.TO and CLSA.TO?

XFN.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CLSA.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XFN.TO and 0.60% for CLSA.TO.