XFIV vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XFIV (BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XFIV tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. XFIV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.

Performance

XFIV vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XFIV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFIV vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	-0.78%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

XFIV vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIV

XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 27
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIV vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFIV	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFIV	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	—	—

Drawdowns

XFIV vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFIV	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.38%	0.00%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	0.00%	-2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	0.00%	-1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XFIV	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	0.00%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.42%	0.00%	+5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.42%	0.00%	+5.42%

XFIV vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XFIV vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.82%	4.05%	3.92%	3.63%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XFIV or IBTE?

On fees, XFIV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFIV or IBTE?

XFIV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XFIV or IBTE?

XFIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between XFIV and IBTE?

XFIV tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XFIV and 0.07% for IBTE.