XFEB vs. AIRR
XFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. XFEB is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. Over the past year, XFEB returned 10.47% vs 37.54% for AIRR. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
XFEB vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFEB achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 19.12% return.
XFEB
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.76%
AIRR
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 37.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.02%
- 5Y*
- 23.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.28M | $88.15M | $93.52M | |
| $48.22K | $43.62K | $38.05K |
XFEB vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 5.40% | 9.12% | 9.14% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 19.12% | 27.92% | 27.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFEB and AIRR is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XFEB and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFEB vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
XFEB
AIRR
XFEB vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFEB | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.21 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.01 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 7.71 | +6.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFEB vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.07%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFEB and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFEB | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -42.37% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.12% | -17.18% | +13.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.16% | +12.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -7.46% | +6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 4.48% | -3.76% |
Volatility
XFEB vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) is 1.06%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that XFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFEB | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 10.08% | -9.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.05% | 22.37% | -18.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.54% | 28.07% | -23.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 25.72% | -18.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 26.47% | -19.52% |
XFEB vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFEB vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
XFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.09% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
XFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFEB and AIRR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to XFEB (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFEB dropped -9.07% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 1-year performance, AIRR leads with 37.54% vs 10.47% for XFEB. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, XFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 37.54% return vs 10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFEB.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for XFEB.
XFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFEB and 0.69% for AIRR.
XFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XFEB and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer