PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFEB vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFEB vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFEB achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 35.61% return.


XFEB

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.31%
YTD
4.40%
6M
4.56%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIRR

1D
1.80%
1M
6.55%
YTD
35.61%
6M
31.10%
1Y
71.43%
3Y*
37.98%
5Y*
27.26%
10Y*
22.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFEB vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XFEB and AIRR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024

0.63

The correlation between XFEB and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFEB vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFEB
XFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFEB vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XFEBAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.43

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

5.49

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.75

20.05

-3.29

XFEB vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFEB and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFEB vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.07%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFEB and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFEBAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-42.37%

+33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-13.09%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-7.47%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

3.57%

-2.86%

Volatility

XFEB vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) is 1.31%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that XFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFEBAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

8.25%

-6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

20.44%

-16.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

26.28%

-21.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

25.42%

-18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.07%

26.35%

-19.28%

XFEB vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFEB vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

XFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
XFEB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFEB and AIRR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to XFEB (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFEB dropped -9.07% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 1-year performance, AIRR leads with 71.43% vs 11.85% for XFEB. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, XFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 71.43% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFEB.

AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for XFEB.

XFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFEB and 0.69% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFEB and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer