XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO
XEXP.TO (iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF) and BGIN.NEO (BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series) are both Technology Equities funds. XEXP.TO is passively managed, while BGIN.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, XEXP.TO returned 41.18% vs 88.73% for BGIN.NEO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEXP.TO charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BGIN.NEO.
Performance
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEXP.TO achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly lower than BGIN.NEO's 54.53% return.
XEXP.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 11.43%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 41.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIN.NEO
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 21.71%
- YTD
- 54.53%
- 6M
- 53.21%
- 1Y
- 88.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XEXP.TO iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF | 21.53% | 13.97% | 9.27% | 9.60% |
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 54.53% | 19.37% | 32.08% | 11.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEXP.TO and BGIN.NEO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
XEXP.TO
BGIN.NEO
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEXP.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.64 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 6.75 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 21.35 | -10.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEXP.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 3.44 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.57 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEXP.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum BGIN.NEO drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEXP.TO and BGIN.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEXP.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -29.19% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -13.23% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -4.44% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.17% | -0.29% |
Volatility
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) is 5.54%, while BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that XEXP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEXP.TO | BGIN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 9.24% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 21.40% | -8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.48% | 25.92% | -9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 26.10% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 26.10% | -7.18% |
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEXP.TO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIN.NEO's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEXP.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
XEXP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than BGIN.NEO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
XEXP.TO iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.80% | 0.63% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEXP.TO and BGIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEXP.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEXP.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XEXP.TO and 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.
Find the right allocation for XEXP.TO and BGIN.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer