BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO
BGIN.NEO (BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series) and QMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BGIN.NEO is actively managed, while QMVP.TO is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGIN.NEO charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QMVP.TO.
Performance
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGIN.NEO
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 51.05%
- 6M
- 49.76%
- 1Y
- 84.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMVP.TO
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 41.91% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 25.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGIN.NEO and QMVP.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGIN.NEO
QMVP.TO
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGIN.NEO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGIN.NEO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 3.99 | -2.47 |
Drawdowns
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGIN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIN.NEO and QMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGIN.NEO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -12.77% | -16.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -1.07% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -3.83% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | — | — |
Volatility
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGIN.NEO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.04% | 21.69% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 21.69% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 21.69% | +4.43% |
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGIN.NEO has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGIN.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGIN.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, which matches QMVP.TO's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.12% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGIN.NEO and QMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BGIN.NEO and 0.19% for QMVP.TO.
Find the right allocation for BGIN.NEO and QMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer