PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEWG.L is traded in GBP, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEWG.L achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.


XEWG.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.81%
6M
10.01%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
-2.13%
1M
14.77%
YTD
23.32%
6M
22.05%
1Y
53.36%
3Y*
30.65%
5Y*
24.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged
8.81%11.07%11.66%11.87%-14.07%1.31%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
23.32%14.31%39.50%48.82%-22.54%3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XEWG.L and XSTC.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.49

The correlation between XEWG.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEWG.L
XSTC.L

Technology

18.3%
99.6%

Industrials

14.7%
0.2%

Financial Services

14.4%
0.1%

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Utilities

6.1%

-

Energy

4.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
0.1%

Technology

XEWG.L
18.3%
XSTC.L
99.6%

Industrials

XEWG.L
14.7%
XSTC.L
0.2%

Financial Services

XEWG.L
14.4%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Healthcare

XEWG.L
10.9%
XSTC.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XEWG.L
10.3%
XSTC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XEWG.L
6.5%
XSTC.L

-

Real Estate

XEWG.L
6.2%
XSTC.L

-

Utilities

XEWG.L
6.1%
XSTC.L

-

Energy

XEWG.L
4.6%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

XEWG.L
4.1%
XSTC.L

-

Communication Services

XEWG.L
4.0%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEWG.L
XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEWG.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.04

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

7.79

+2.16

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEWG.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEWG.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.70

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.14

-0.76

Drawdowns

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEWG.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEWG.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-29.30%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-17.49%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.42%

-29.30%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.71%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-6.30%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

6.83%

-4.89%

Volatility

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) is 2.58%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XEWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEWG.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

7.05%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

14.45%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

19.63%

-8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

22.22%

-5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

22.43%

-5.88%

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEWG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEWG.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than XSTC.L's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged
1.19%1.25%1.50%1.24%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEWG.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

XEWG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XEWG.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEWG.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer