XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XEWG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged) and S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) are both S&P 500 funds - XEWG.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index while S5SD.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XEWG.L returned 18.80% vs 30.12% for S5SD.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEWG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.L.

Performance

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XEWG.L is traded in GBP, while S5SD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S5SD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XEWG.L having a 8.81% return and S5SD.L slightly higher at 9.02%.

XEWG.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 8.81%
• 6M: 10.01%
• 1Y: 18.80%
• 3Y*: 14.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

S5SD.L

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XEWG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged	8.81%	16.06%
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis	9.02%	27.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XEWG.L and S5SD.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.52

The correlation between XEWG.L and S5SD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XEWG.L	S5SD.L
Technology	18.3%	38.6%
Industrials	14.7%	6.8%
Financial Services	14.4%	12.0%
Healthcare	10.9%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	5.1%
Real Estate	6.2%	2.2%
Utilities	6.1%	0.8%
Energy	4.6%	4.2%
Basic Materials	4.1%	1.9%
Communication Services	4.0%	14.5%

Return for Risk

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEWG.L

XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

S5SD.L

S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEWG.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.89	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.93	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.54	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	4.13	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	15.94	-5.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEWG.L and S5SD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEWG.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.89	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	3.09	-2.72

Drawdowns

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -7.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEWG.L and S5SD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEWG.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.61%	-7.32%	-15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-7.32%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.44%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-1.26%	-5.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.90%	+0.04%

Volatility

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) is 2.58%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that XEWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5SD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEWG.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	2.81%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.36%	7.10%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	10.53%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	11.47%	+5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	11.47%	+5.08%

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEWG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEWG.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison

XEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEWG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged	1.19%	1.25%	1.50%	1.24%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEWG.L and S5SD.L in my portfolio?

XEWG.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XEWG.L or S5SD.L?

On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEWG.L or S5SD.L?

S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

What is the main difference between XEWG.L and S5SD.L?

XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index, while S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XEWG.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.