PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XEU.TO (iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - XEU.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Eur GR CAD, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. XEU.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEU.TO returned 9.77%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for XGRO.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEU.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.

Performance

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEU.TO achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XEU.TO having a 9.77% annualized return and XGRO.TO not far ahead at 10.20%.

XEU.TO

1D
-0.82%
1M
5.05%
YTD
6.82%
6M
8.23%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
9.77%

XGRO.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
5.42%
YTD
10.38%
6M
8.74%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEU.TO
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF		6.82%29.40%9.36%17.36%-10.48%16.36%3.16%18.30%-8.11%18.48%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		10.38%15.59%19.53%15.01%-11.08%14.29%11.51%17.97%-6.73%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XEU.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2014

0.61

The correlation between XEU.TO and XGRO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XEU.TO
XGRO.TO

Financial Services

22.5%
20.3%

Industrials

15.6%
7.3%

Healthcare

10.5%
5.1%

Technology

8.4%
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
6.3%

Basic Materials

5.3%
5.6%

Energy

4.0%
7.2%

Utilities

3.5%
1.5%

Communication Services

3.3%
6.8%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

XEU.TO
22.5%
XGRO.TO
20.3%

Industrials

XEU.TO
15.6%
XGRO.TO
7.3%

Healthcare

XEU.TO
10.5%
XGRO.TO
5.1%

Technology

XEU.TO
8.4%
XGRO.TO
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

XEU.TO
8.0%
XGRO.TO
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XEU.TO
6.5%
XGRO.TO
6.3%

Basic Materials

XEU.TO
5.3%
XGRO.TO
5.6%

Energy

XEU.TO
4.0%
XGRO.TO
7.2%

Utilities

XEU.TO
3.5%
XGRO.TO
1.5%

Communication Services

XEU.TO
3.3%
XGRO.TO
6.8%

Real Estate

XEU.TO
1.4%
XGRO.TO
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Often compared with XEU.TO:
XEU.TO vs. XEH.TOXEU.TO vs. XEF.TOXEU.TO vs. VE.TOXEU.TO vs. VEAXEU.TO vs. HXS.TOXEU.TO vs. XUS.TOXEU.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Often compared with XGRO.TO:
XGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. XCG.TOXGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. XAW.TO

Return for Risk

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEU.TO
XEU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XEU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO
XGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XEU.TOXGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.32
2.18

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.90
3.09

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.30

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

14.67

-8.61

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEU.TO and XGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XEU.TOXGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.18

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.99

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.35

+0.18

Drawdowns

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEU.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.02%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEU.TO and XGRO.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEU.TOXGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.02%

-47.97%

+15.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-7.12%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-12.47%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-18.40%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.02%

-25.85%

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-0.18%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-8.49%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.60%

+1.49%

Volatility

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) at 3.43%. This indicates that XEU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEU.TOXGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

3.43%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

9.19%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

10.78%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

11.05%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

12.26%

+3.83%

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEU.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEU.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.76% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEU.TO
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF		2.31%2.47%2.68%2.96%3.03%2.42%1.98%3.56%3.28%2.27%2.91%2.33%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		1.76%1.92%1.98%2.22%1.86%1.66%1.94%2.21%7.42%2.04%2.65%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEU.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XEU.TO.

XEU.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XEU.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEU.TO and XGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer