PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XESX.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XESX.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XESX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L returned 8.41%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for XDJP.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.

Performance

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 8.41%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.

XESX.L

1D
0.61%
1M
4.49%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.79%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
8.41%

XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D		5.63%24.66%2.94%16.40%-8.32%12.93%0.07%18.58%-12.98%10.98%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XESX.L and XDJP.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013

0.51

The correlation between XESX.L and XDJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XESX.L
XDJP.L

Financial Services

26.0%
3.1%

Industrials

22.9%
19.4%

Technology

16.7%
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
16.9%

Healthcare

5.6%
6.7%

Energy

5.4%
0.3%

Utilities

5.0%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
12.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.3%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Financial Services

XESX.L
26.0%
XDJP.L
3.1%

Industrials

XESX.L
22.9%
XDJP.L
19.4%

Technology

XESX.L
16.7%
XDJP.L
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XESX.L
10.2%
XDJP.L
16.9%

Healthcare

XESX.L
5.6%
XDJP.L
6.7%

Energy

XESX.L
5.4%
XDJP.L
0.3%

Utilities

XESX.L
5.0%
XDJP.L
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

XESX.L
4.1%
XDJP.L
3.3%

Communication Services

XESX.L
2.4%
XDJP.L
12.4%

Basic Materials

XESX.L
1.8%
XDJP.L
4.3%

Real Estate

XESX.L

-

XDJP.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with XESX.L:
XESX.L vs. IDWR.LXESX.L vs. FEZXESX.L vs. URTHXESX.L vs. SPX4.LXESX.L vs. EUN.LXESX.L vs. FTWG.LXESX.L vs. VEUR.L
Often compared with XDJP.L:
XDJP.L vs. CNKY.LXDJP.L vs. VJPN.LXDJP.L vs. DXJXDJP.L vs. DXJG.LXDJP.L vs. PRIJ.LXDJP.L vs. CSJP.LXDJP.L vs. JPJP.L

Return for Risk

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XESX.L
XESX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XESX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XESX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XESX.LXDJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.03
2.85

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.55
3.94

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.48

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.77

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

14.50

-10.10

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESX.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XESX.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.85

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.71

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.75

-0.59

Drawdowns

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than XDJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and XDJP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XESX.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-23.69%

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-13.40%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-18.82%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.79%

-20.61%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

-23.69%

-7.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.35%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-6.79%

-7.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

4.42%

-0.86%

Volatility

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) is 4.86%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that XESX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XESX.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

6.75%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

17.68%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

22.44%

-7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

17.72%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

17.63%

+0.64%

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XESX.L and XDJP.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XESX.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XDJP.L's 1.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D		0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.05%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XESX.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESX.L and XDJP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

XESX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESX.L and XDJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer