PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XESX.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than SX5S.L's 6.46% return. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L has underperformed SX5S.L with an annualized return of 8.41%, while SX5S.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


XESX.L

1D
0.61%
1M
4.49%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.79%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
8.41%

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
4.85%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.51%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D
5.63%24.66%2.94%16.40%-8.32%12.93%0.07%18.58%-12.98%10.98%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-10.62%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XESX.L and SX5S.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014

0.82

The correlation between XESX.L and SX5S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XESX.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

26.0%
25.1%

Industrials

22.9%
22.1%

Technology

16.7%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
5.4%

Energy

5.4%
5.2%

Utilities

5.0%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

XESX.L
26.0%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Industrials

XESX.L
22.9%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Technology

XESX.L
16.7%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XESX.L
10.2%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Healthcare

XESX.L
5.6%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Energy

XESX.L
5.4%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Utilities

XESX.L
5.0%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

XESX.L
4.1%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Communication Services

XESX.L
2.4%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

XESX.L
1.8%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Real Estate

XESX.L

-

SX5S.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESX.L
XESX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XESX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XESX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESX.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.62

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

5.40

-1.00

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESX.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESX.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.23

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.69

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.59

-0.43

Drawdowns

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than SX5S.L's maximum drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESX.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-32.54%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.43%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-13.85%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.79%

-21.71%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

-32.54%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.57%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-5.44%

-8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.44%

+0.12%

Volatility

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) have volatilities of 4.86% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESX.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

4.90%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

12.23%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

15.09%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

17.62%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

19.88%

-1.61%

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XESX.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SX5S.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D
0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.05%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XESX.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESX.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESX.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESX.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer