PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XESX.L vs. IMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XESX.L vs. IMV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XESX.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - XESX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while IMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L returned 8.41%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for IMV.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XESX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IMV.L.

Performance

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than IMV.L's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L has outperformed IMV.L with an annualized return of 8.41%, while IMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.

XESX.L

1D
0.61%
1M
4.49%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.79%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
8.41%

IMV.L

1D
0.51%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.90%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D		5.63%24.66%2.94%16.40%-8.32%12.93%0.07%18.58%-12.98%10.98%
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS		4.72%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XESX.L and IMV.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.78

The correlation between XESX.L and IMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XESX.L
IMV.L

Financial Services

26.0%
17.9%

Industrials

22.9%
15.4%

Technology

16.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
3.6%

Healthcare

5.6%
13.0%

Energy

5.4%
7.1%

Utilities

5.0%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
13.1%

Communication Services

2.4%
9.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Financial Services

XESX.L
26.0%
IMV.L
17.9%

Industrials

XESX.L
22.9%
IMV.L
15.4%

Technology

XESX.L
16.7%
IMV.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XESX.L
10.2%
IMV.L
3.6%

Healthcare

XESX.L
5.6%
IMV.L
13.0%

Energy

XESX.L
5.4%
IMV.L
7.1%

Utilities

XESX.L
5.0%
IMV.L
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XESX.L
4.1%
IMV.L
13.1%

Communication Services

XESX.L
2.4%
IMV.L
9.6%

Basic Materials

XESX.L
1.8%
IMV.L
5.6%

Real Estate

XESX.L

-

IMV.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS

Often compared with XESX.L:
XESX.L vs. IDWR.LXESX.L vs. FEZXESX.L vs. URTHXESX.L vs. SPX4.LXESX.L vs. EUN.LXESX.L vs. FTWG.LXESX.L vs. VEUR.L
Often compared with IMV.L:
IMV.L vs. MIVO.LIMV.L vs. SPYIMV.L vs. MINV.LIMV.L vs. XDEQ.LIMV.L vs. MVUS.LIMV.L vs. UB06.LIMV.L vs. CSWG.L

Return for Risk

XESX.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XESX.L
XESX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XESX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XESX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XESX.LIMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.03
0.91

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.55
1.27

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.97

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

2.92

+1.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the IMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESX.L and IMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XESX.LIMV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.91

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.69

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.62

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.71

-0.55

Drawdowns

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than IMV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and IMV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XESX.LIMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-24.48%

-22.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-8.50%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-8.50%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.79%

-17.42%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

-24.48%

-7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-4.62%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-3.57%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.83%

+0.73%

Volatility

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that XESX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XESX.LIMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

2.89%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

7.71%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

9.13%

+6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

10.97%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

12.31%

+5.96%

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IMV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XESX.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison

XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while IMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D		0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.05%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XESX.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.

XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESX.L and 0.25% for IMV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESX.L and IMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer