XESC.L vs. CS1.L
XESC.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and CS1.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - XESC.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CS1.L tracks the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XESC.L returned 11.56%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for CS1.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XESC.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CS1.L.
Performance
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XESC.L having a 6.52% return and CS1.L slightly lower at 6.29%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XESC.L having a 11.56% annualized return and CS1.L not far ahead at 12.13%.
XESC.L
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
CS1.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 37.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESC.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 6.52% | 28.16% | 6.11% | 20.06% | -3.40% | 15.50% | 3.15% | 21.73% | -10.68% | 14.50% |
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 6.29% | 62.63% | 14.12% | 24.14% | 4.89% | 0.59% | -7.48% | 8.06% | -11.27% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESC.L and CS1.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2011 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XESC.L and CS1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XESC.L
CS1.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
XESC.L
CS1.L
Industrials
XESC.L
CS1.L
Technology
XESC.L
CS1.L
Consumer Cyclical
XESC.L
CS1.L
Healthcare
XESC.L
CS1.L
Energy
XESC.L
CS1.L
Utilities
XESC.L
CS1.L
Consumer Defensive
XESC.L
CS1.L
Communication Services
XESC.L
CS1.L
Basic Materials
XESC.L
CS1.L
Real Estate
XESC.L
-
CS1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XESC.L vs. CS1.L — Risk / Return Rank
XESC.L
CS1.L
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XESC.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.60 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 12.14 | -6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XESC.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.30 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 1.16 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.49 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESC.L drawdown since its inception was -34.48%, smaller than the maximum CS1.L drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.L and CS1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XESC.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.48% | -38.87% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.53% | -10.34% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.23% | -10.34% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -18.82% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.64% | -38.87% | +7.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.98% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -10.34% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.07% | +0.37% |
Volatility
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XESC.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 4.68% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 13.37% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 16.14% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 16.72% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 18.48% | -0.67% |
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESC.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CS1.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XESC.L vs. CS1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XESC.L nor CS1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XESC.L and CS1.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CS1.L.
XESC.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESC.L and 0.25% for CS1.L.
Find the right allocation for XESC.L and CS1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer